"Something Worth Fighting For"
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT
By Arshad Mohammed
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."
"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.
While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.
"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.
However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."
"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.
The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.
Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.
Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.
The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.
Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.
The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.
The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.
A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.
(Editing by Eric Beech)
Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:56pm EDT
By Arshad Mohammed
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."
"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.
While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.
"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.
However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."
"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.
The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.
Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.
Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.
The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.
Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.
The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.
The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.
A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.
(Editing by Eric Beech)
About
Daily Vote
Badge
CNN
CNN Heroes: Richard Branson
The founder and president of the Virgin Group helps tackle social and environmental problems.Health care and abortion
Abortion is becoming a key issue in the health care reform debate.Jackson brothers on Larry King
Michael Jackson's brothers sit down with Larry King to discuss their upcoming reality show.Heart screening for kids
Should young children get heart screenings? A new experiment is being done on kids and the results are stunning.Downer pigs in the food supply
CNN's Nicole Lapin reports on Humane Society efforts to get "downer pigs" banned from the food supply.Underwood sings 'Change'
Carrie Underwood's original orchestral arrangement of "Change" at 2009's CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute.Soldier beds in Afghanistan
They jokingly call it "Hotel California." CNN's Barbara Starr takes us into the bedrooms of the Bagram sleeping quartersSnow coast to coast
iReporters share their wintry images from the first major winter storm of the season.The Buzz Today
Gosselin is most provocative, Tiger is mocked by "SNL," and other news from HLN's Showbiz Tonight.Winter weather forecast
The Midwest and Northeast brace for an incoming storm system. CNN's Jacqui Jeras reports.H1N1 flu not too severe
A study finds that the H1N1 fall/winter flu season may not be as severe as once predicted. CNN's Susan Hendricks reports.Emergency at Woods' home
A hospital update on Tiger Woods' mother-in-law, who was released hours after being admitted with stomach pain.Tech Torture with Topher: Day two
CNN's Topher Kohan takes online TV watching on the road using Hulu and NFL sites.Holding out for discounts
CNN's Stephanie Elam looks at how holiday shoppers are holding out for better deals.A partridge in a pear tree
Meet Mike Johnson, well-known in the west of England for making traditional pear cider known as perry.Oil brings pollution fears
Oil exploration in southern Sudan is raising anxiety. CNN's David McKenzie reports.Thousands gather for funeral
Thousands of police pay tribute to four officers who were gunned down in Washington state.Insurance for abortions?
As the abortion debate continues, CNN's Anderson Cooper visits a Planned Parenthood clinic in New York.© 2009 Created by Doug Kimsey on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network
